Overall, I enjoy the podcast, agree with most of the opinions of Rav & the guests, and have interests in all of these subjects. Unfortunately, there’s a lot of wasted time repeating the same information & venting about flaws in the system. I agree with most of this, and am happy there is a focus on it, but I gain nothing from hearing it a million times. For example, in the episode, myth of exercise with Andy Galpin, Rav started by listing a bunch of interesting topics he hoped to explore. If the episode was focused more on learning about those topics, with cited studies or anecdotal evidence that points to conclusions, things I can take away and utilize in my life, and less venting about flaws in the system, I would have gotten more out of it. This seems to happen in many episodes. Lots of wasted time discussing things I’ve heard over and over. Overall, Rav, I appreciate how you openly explore issues, without needing to jump to a solution too quickly. I appreciate your vulnerability, humility, honesty, intelligence, and when you interrupt a speaker, in order to share an important counterpoint. For example, in the episode on CBT & Trauma, when the psychologist shared opinions as objective truths, i.e. therapy should not last for more than a certain period of time, affirmations don’t actually do anything, you shared how being in therapy for long periods of time gave you space to reach new, important realizations, and how & why affirmations helped you through anxiety. Great counterpoints that deepen the conversation & are helpful takeaways for listeners. My advice, don’t repeat the same conversations a million people on the internet are having. There’s too many podcasts out there and too little time. Focus more on keeping the conversation to what listeners can pick up on and utilize in their lives.

Thank you for your efforts and integrity. Less interruption of guests would be helpful to follow the logic of speakers.

Starting off with the format, I wish they would be more focused in their discussions. The episode about genetics of obesity was interesting but just meandered all over the place and was hard to follow (throwing out “studies” in tiny droplets without full disclosure or references, etc.) One guest was a proponent of a supposed miracle herb/medicine but “she couldn’t remember the name of it.” Do they do that on purpose so that the lack of strong evidence for any one point is obscured? As far as the content, I welcome hearing all sides of all issues, but there are VERY often opinions thrown out in the guise of “science.” The current episode has a science “expert” on how he endorses Trump because it’s better to “leave the past behind.” He never does any comparison with the other Presidential candidates, other than fawning over RFK Jr. and hoping Trump puts him on his Cabinet. The guest has been to Mar-a-Lago etc. but says he is looking objectively at Trump. Trump, he says, is the “least bad option.” But he never directly explains why the other candidate would not fit any of his requirements. He says Americans are all “drooling at Pavlov’s bell” instead of being scientific yet he calls use of masks a “weaponized fear.” To summarize, overall this podcast likes to see itself as “speaking the truth,” but the information is presented haphazardly and piecemeal and does little to nothing to make their case of true scientific skepticism. Get some focus and clear theses, please, and reduce the overly wordy rambling.

High level but easy to understand science discussions. COVID-19 discussions that reveal how censorship was critical to help create a false narrative.

What is a podcast like this doing having McDonald’s as an advertisement to start off the podcast? Might want to look up integrity and reevaluate what your morals and ethics are.

The good doctor needs to get better at interviewing his guests. I am listening to the episode on the CA bill to restrict doctors’ speech. I want details not just statements and concerns and stories. Please spend the first part of the podcast insisting on information. Details. I have a general sense of the history of doctors speaking out during the pandemic but even one or two concrete examples would be useful. Stop assuming you’re preaching to a choir who knows all the music. Speak to everyone please.

So grateful to the doctor and the guests he has on his podcast. People are craving conversation, discussion, information, etc. during this time – post pandemic. This is a great podcast to delve into discussions from all points of view. Thank you.

This podcasts now has some sponsors and I welcome the on air reading of those ads. However, they sound like they were recorded on a 1985 Sony Walkman. You got to up your game especially as the importance of the podcast grows. Grab a 20 year old kid to help you set up a proper recording studio with a proper mic. Keep up they great content.

Love his courage and common sense commitment

She’s a hero. Thank you!

Great topics great variance of guests. My one constructive criticism- was listening to the interview of Ethan but, your interruptions got a bit distracting at points. Overall worth listening.

We must hope that the medical establishment will return to unbiased evidence-based solid science rather than misleading studies led by pursuit of profit.

Great podcast and really appreciate the work you guys are doing! Several episodes need editing (unintended conversations, breaks, etc.) but overall well done.

I am totally supportive of Jay and his message - and entirely opposed to censorship - but this podcast has has some very “fringe” guests. I’m not even sure that the host believes them. The Malone podcasts, in particular, are terrible. Malone comes off as an egotistical, self-aggrandizing, ranty uncle. Jay keeps trying to guide him in productive directions, but Malone can’t resist the lure of deep-state conspiracy, on any topic. I hate to say it, but when the hosts find out that a guest really is a loon, they probably shouldn’t publish the podcast.

A very scientific and clear discussion platform. Dr. B is a leader in the COVID solution and a breath of fresh air! ALSO, please address the climate “consensus” It has so many parallels. Keep it up!

As a nurse myself since 1995… you’ve been my only reprieve from the insanity I saw from my co workers and head of health. I’ll never be able to go back after what I’ve seen. Thank you!!!

Science is challenging consensus. Anti-intellectual politics has consumed science to the point of people claiming men can menstruate.

As an angry Covid mom Listening to this is therapeutic. Thank you.

A podcast about not buying into weaponized scientific consensus (which you shouldn’t) that within the first few minutes makes the claim that the “consensus” in nutrition science on what makes a healthy diet is a valid consensus. Nutrition science is one of the most inaccurate science fields that is full of bias, data hacking, twisting correlations and out right fraud. It is hard to take the podcast seriously when it goes against the very premise they are trying to make. Hopefully it will improve but I have my doubts.

Is there a wiser, kinder, more accomplished commentator on public health issues? He is the gold standard.

Great podcast - explores the ideas that need to be discussed more openly if there’s any hope for us to progress as humans.